Sylabus
[In case of distance learning, students will be informed two weeks in advance of any changes to the course program and method of instruction.]
Week 1: intro to the First Amendment
· principles of freedom of speech/expression
· what constitutes speech/expression
Week 2: hate speech /extremist expression under the First Amendment
· incitement principle: Brandenburg v. Ohio (speech of KKK)
· The Skokie controversy
Week 3: ECtHR case analysis
· Norwood v. United Kingdom (hostility toward a religious group)
· Perincek v. Switzerland (Armenian genocide denial)
· Waldron’s “dignity” argument
Week 4: threatening speech
· true threats principle: Planned Parenthood v. ACLA (controversial anti-abortion website)
Week 5: personally offensive speech
· Hustler v. Falwell (satire involving public figures)
· Snyder v. Phelps (funeral protest)
Week 6: symbolic speech
· U.S. v. O’Brien (burning of the draft card)
· Texas v. Johnson (flag burning)
Week 7: student speech rights in public schools
· Tinker v. Des Moines (armband political protest)
· Bethel v. Fraser (lewd and indecent speech)
· Morse v. Frederick (drug reference)
Week 8: First Assessment – Moot Court
· [two teams of 3 lawyers – all other students are judges]
Week 9: prohibition of establishment of religion
· approaches to secularism
· secularism in schools: Wallace v. Jaffree, Lee v. Weisman
Week 10: free exercise of religion
· Employment Division v. Smith (drug use in religious ritual)
· Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah (animal sacrifice)
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado (cake for same-sex wedding)
Anotace
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution safeguards freedom of expression, freedom of religion, and freedom of press, and also protects the principle of separation of church and state. Studying the judicial interpretation of the First Amendment is fundamental to understanding constitutional law in the United States, as many important and controversial high court cases have concerned the First Amendment, especially in recent years. This course focuses on U.S. Supreme Court decisions in selected First Amendment cases, including the arguments asserted and reasoning applied. Students are required to assess these cases and make legal arguments in seminar discussions and also formal moot court debate exercises. In particular, the cases in this course concern the following topics: symbolic expression, extremist expression, political satire, threatening speech, speech rights of students, establishment of religion, and exercise of religion. This course also takes a comparative approach to studying many of the decisions, especially those which are inconsistent with the decisions of European courts in similar cases. Cultural differences and implications are naturally considered as well. The objectives of this course include the following:
1) to deepen students’ understanding of U.S. interpretation of freedom of expression and religion;
2) to provide context for students to compare and assess various approaches to such issues;
3) to provide a framework for students to evaluate the applicability and merits of First Amendment legal arguments in potential future cases;
4) to aid students in acquiring and using sophisticated legal English vocabulary and grammar. Předmět se zaměří na První dodatek Ústavy USA, který zaujímá v americkém právu velmi důležité, i když kontroverzní postavení. První dodatek zakazuje, aby byly přijímány zákony bránící náboženské svobodě, omezující svobodu slova a tisku. Budou analyzovány klíčové případy projednávané Nejvyšším soudem USA včetně právní argumentace a názorů soudců. Cílem je seznámit studenty s přístupem k výkladu Ústavy v USA, s podstatnými argumenty, které mohou ovlivnit řešení případů v budoucnu, a naučit studenty pracovat se složitým jazykem americké judikatury. Podstatou je, aby se studenti naučili kriticky analyzovat argumenty protistrany a efektivně a kompetentně prezentovat svůj názor.