Dis/advantaging the family and society: the role of the welfare state
Course Description
The study of social inequalities has been one of the major focuses of social sciences. This course will focus on the role of the welfare state in such inequalities; as the actor intervening in solving social inequalities, but also as the actor which creates new or maintain existing inequalities. In an interactive form, the course will try to introduce students to various forms and facets of inequalities and the way how these inequalities, as produced by the welfare state, can be identified.
Mode of Delivery
Online
Workload 1,5 hour intensive Seminars every week over the teaching period unless otherwise notified. Students will be expected to undertake a further 5-6 hours independent learning each week over the semester (to prepare discussion assignments).
Prerequisites
Offered by
Public and Social Policy Department
Phone
+49 561 804-3214
Martin.gurin@uni-kassel.de
Office hours for student consultation
By appointment
Tutor
Martin Gurín
SUMMER SEMESTER 2022-23
COURSE OVERVIEW
Learning Outcomes
By the end of this course, students should be able to: i. Define major conceptual frameworks for social inequality. ii. Identify the actors and processes involved in dis/advantaging of different societal groups. iii. Identify and critique policy and governance frameworks relevant to critical arenas of welfare state regulations. iv. Understand the role of social policy in social change.
Assessment Summary
Assessment Task
Value
Due Date
Linked Learning Outcomes 1. Collective assignment – team presentation 40% of the final grade 13th Seminar i, iii, & iv 2. Reading assignments – discussion preparation 35% of the final grade 2-12th Seminar i,ii,iii, & iv 3. Research assignments 25% of final grade 3-10th Seminar i,ii,iii, & iv
Feedback
Staff Feedback
Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:
· Verbal feedback of a formative nature during seminars;
· Written feedback of a formative nature based on individual assignments; and
· Written feedback of a summative nature based on final (collective) assignment.
Student Feedback
· Continuous and final feedback will be provided in both verbal and written way. Students are free to provide feedback on all aspects of the course: literature, content, organisation as well as study load.
COURSE SCHEDULE
Date
Topic
Summary of Activities
Assessment 15.02.2023 1
Introduction 22.02.2023 2
Deservingness
Reading assignment 01.03.2023 3
Social Investment
Research assignment 08.03.2023 4
Activation and workfare (1/2)
Reading assignment 15.03.2023 5
Activation and workfare (2/2)
Research assignment 22.03.2023 6
Homeless people in the trap of the welfare state
Reading assignment 29.03.2023 7
Disabilities: caregivers or care recipients?
Class debate 05.04.2023 8
Intersectionality and intersectional inequalities
Reading assignment 12.04.2023 9
Family and gender
Reading assignment 19.04.2023 10
Immigration and the welfare state
Reading assignment 26.04.2022 11
Sexual citizenship (1/2)
Reading assignment 03.05.2022 12
Sexual citizenship (2/2)
Research assignment 10.05.2022 13
Conclusion of the course
Final assignment (presentation)
ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS
General design: In assessing Seminar participation, the following criteria will be taken into consideration:
(I) Regular participation in weekly discussions
· (II) Discussion of the required literature („individual“ assignment) o Demonstration of preparation (i.e. done the reading and thought about it); o Demonstration of understanding of or engagement with the topic; o Raising relevant questions, points and challenges; and o Listening actively and responding to others in a constructive fashion.
§ Based on weekly assignments (written, uploaded via Moodle) (0-35%)
· (III) Research assignments and their discussion (0-25%) o Demonstration of preparation (i.e. fulfilment of the set research-homework). o Creativity and analytical skills.
· (IV) Preparation of the final assignment – team presentation („collective“ assignment) o Preparation within the semester, results being presented at the 15th Seminar (0-40%)
Assessment II – individual assignments
Students are required to read compulsory weekly literature and prepare answers to set questions. Each assignment is equal to 5 points.
· Discussion of the comprehension questions in several (2-4) subgroups o Need to find the super answer! o What are the answers? Where can answers be found? à complete your answers. o Do you have any questions regarding literature? o Are you curious about any specific topic that can be covered later in the course?
Continuously: there should be some feedback about the literature: how easy/difficult is to comprehend the literature (= evaluation of academic texts/writing)
Contributing to discussions can be difficult for some students, especially those who have English as a Second Language (ESL), but there are different ways of contributing to discussion:
Giving an example to illustrate what someone else has said;
Agreeing, but adding some suggestions;
Comparing what has been said to something else you know about (perhaps something you have read);
Disagreeing —and giving your reasons
Asking a question or introducing a new topic.
Listening actively is also part of participation. Students can show that they’re participating by looking interested, which means:
Looking at