Empirical antifungal therapy is still the standard treatment approach in febrile neutropenic patient with hematological malignancy. Preemptive treatment approach is based on the imaging (hrCT), and/or serological (galactomannan antigen) results suggesting fungal disease.
So the virtue of preemptive therapy is that it is based on objective markers of “probable ” invasive infection. In this article we discuss the differences between empiric, “clinically driven“ therapy and preemptive, “diagnostic driven“ therapy of “probable” invasive infection.