Rat strain differences in responses of plasma prolactin and PRL mRNA expression after acute amphetamine treatment or restraint stress

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of acute amphetamine (AMPH) treatment and restraint stress on plasma level of prolactin (PRL) and PRL mRNA expression in the adenohypophysis in Sprague-Dawley and Lewis male rats, the latter known to have a deficient hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.

2. Both restraint stress and AMPH treatment (i.p. in a dose of 8 mg/kg of b.w.) were applied 15 or 30 min before termination of the experiment. Plasma PRL and corticosterone (CORT) were determined by radioimmunoassay PRL mRNA expression was estimated by a dot-blot hybridization.

3. Restraint stress and AMPH treatment induced a significant increase in the CORT plasma level, as an indicator of stress response. Compared to Sprague-Dawley rats; the magnitude of CORT increase after both stimuli was significantly lower in Lewis rats.

4. Although restraint stress significantly increased the PRL plasma levels in both rat strains, AMPH treatment reduced the PRL levels in both rat strains. However, the changes of PRL plasma levels had another pattern in Lewis rats than in Sprague-Dawley rats. Control plasma PRL levers were significantly higher in Lewis rats, and in this rat strain AMPH treatment for 30 min increased the PRL levels as compared to the values obtained after AMPH treatment for 15 min.

5. Expression of PRL mRNA in adenohypophysis by restraint stress and AMPH treatment had a similar pattern. After a 35-min lasting restraint stress, the expression of PRL mRNA was decreased insignificantly in both rat strains. AMPH treatment induced in Sprague-Dawley rats a significant decrease of PRL mRNA after a 15-min interval while after 30 min there was a significant increase. However, in Lewis rats AMPH failed to significantly change PRL mRNA.

6. The results from the present study indicate that the mechanisms mediating the effects of acute restraint stress and acute AMPH treatment differ in PRL response in Sprague-Dawley and Lewis male rat strains. Differences in the observed responses in Lewis rats could be related to the deficient activity of HPA axis in this rat strain.