Publication at Faculty of Arts |
2014
Abstract
Slovak historiography has been stubbornly ignoring the progress that has been made in the fascist studies in the recent years. This article seeks to provide an overview of the development in the comparative fascist studies, with an emphasis on the "new consensus" historians.
The main focus is on Roger Griffin's definition of fascism as a genus of political ideology, whose mythic core in its various permutations is a palingenetic form of populist ultranationalism. This article also argues that, if properly used, Griffin's definition can provide a valuable heuristic tool for recognizing and analysing fascist movements.