Abstract
This paper deals with the enumeration of elements that contribute to unification of interpretation of law which is often inconsistent. These elements are democratic element, autoritative element, element of cooperation and discursus, element of transparency, institutional element and there is also a short note dedicated to theoretical element.
The aim of this paper is to create a systematic list of these unifying elements providing examples from praxis when these elements applied and on the other hand critically state, when they should have applied. The ambition of this paper is to support the opinion that the interpretation of law may be under certain conditions unified (or at least more unified), and to support the effort to its unification not only among law theoreticians, but also law practicians