Publication at Faculty of Arts |
2014
Abstract
This paper analyses the conception of human rights by Ladislav Hejdánek as opposed to Kantian constructivism, which was developed in the "west" by John Rawls and others. Both Rawls and Hejdánek are moved by very similar concerns: the need to ground objective values without falling into utilitarianism or some (other) form of naïve ethical objectivism.
They view political values as constructed and yet objective, not given but still sound. Given the immense difference in their professional position and philosophical style, this indicates a truly interesting case of a unity of concern bridging the east and the west, even under very unfavorable political conditions.