Abstrakt
The article is a contribution to a debate between two groups of analytic philosophers who argue for and against the possibility of a fruitful global cross-cultural ethical debate between defenders of religious worldviews and defenders of naturalistic interpretations of reality that might lead to establishing common axiological ground which - as I argue - will be urgently needed for international policy makers in the emerging globalized but multipolar and cultural diverse world. I present one way this axiological common ground might be established.
It is a middle-of-the-road position between cosmopolitan and anti-cosmopolitan extremes.