Charles Explorer logo
🇨🇿

The Influence of the Combination of Carboxylate and Phosphinate Pendant Arms in 1,4,7-Triazacyclononane-Based Chelators on Their 68Ga Labelling Properties

Publikace na Přírodovědecká fakulta |
2015

Tento text není v aktuálním jazyce dostupný. Zobrazuje se verze "en".Abstrakt

In order to compare the coordination properties of 1,4,7-triazacyclononane (tacn) derivatives bearing varying numbers of phosphinic/ carboxylic acid pendant groups towards (68)Ga, 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-7-acetic-1,4-bis(methylenephosphinic) acid (NOPA) and 1,4,7triazacyclononane-4,7-diacetic-1-[methylene(2-carboxyethyl) phosphinic] acid (NO2AP) were synthesized using Mannich reactions with trivalent or pentavalent forms of H-phosphinic acids as phosphorus components. Stepwise protonation constants logK(1-3) 12.06, 3.90 and 1.95, and stability constants with Ga(III) and Cu(II), logK(GaL) 24.01 and logK(CuL) 16.66, were potentiometrically determined for NOPA.

Both ligands were labelled with (68)Ga and compared with NOTA (tacn-N, N', N''-triacetic acid) and NOPO, a TRAP-type [tacn-N, N', N''-tris( methylenephosphinic acid)] chelator. At pH 3, NOPO and NOPA showed higher labelling efficiency (binding with lower ligand excess) at both room temperature and 95 °C, compared to NO2AP and NOTA.

Labelling efficiency at pH = 0-3 correlated with a number of phosphinic acid pendants: NOPO >> NOPA > NO2AP >> NOTA; however, it was more apparent at 95 °C than at room temperature. By contrast, NOTA was found to be labelled more efficiently at pH > 4 compared to the ligands with phosphinic acids.

Overall, replacement of a single phosphinate donor with a carboxylate does not challenge (68)Ga labelling of TRAP-type chelators. However, the presence of carboxylates facilitates labelling at neutral or weakly acidic pH.