Abstract
When the period between 1919-1921/1922 would be evaluated from the perspective of following more than 17 years lasting territorial jurisdiction of Subcarpathian Ruthenia to Czechoslovakia, it can be concluded that the demand of realization of autonomous status of Subcarpathian Ruthenia did not reach better response and interest from the side of Czechoslovak government and other constitutional institutions in a later period as it was in the first three years of territorial jurisdiction to Czechoslovak Republic. Despite the acute confrontation of opinions, they were at least a proof of on-going communication in the questions whose resolution anticipated a peaceful coexistence.
In the following years, Subcarpathian Ruthenia succumbed to its fate being a country periphery. Hence, the central administration could continue in the politics of improvisation which in the relation to Subcarpathian Ruthenia was applied until the fatal end of the 30s.