Abstrakt
Workshop "Critique and/of Deconstruction" brings a new point of view on the relationship between deconstruction and critique in philosophy. It's interested in the both aspects of this critique: in Derrida's reading of other philosopher's works and in other philosopher's reading of Derrida's works.
We wonder whether it is possible to deconstruct the metaphysics by criticizing it. Where is the place Derrida speaks from? Where is the place Derrida's critics speak from? What does it mean to be "wrong"? Can all the various critiques of deconstruction be regularized thanks to something that integrates them all? Is there a common definition of their "wrong"?