Time and Narrative: Challenge for Historical Writing : On Ricoeurian Reading of Simon Schama's Landscape and Memory
Abstrakt
During the past fifty years, a dispute over the nature of historical discourse has taken place with the narrativist approach, arguing for the dominance of narration in history, on the one hand, and professional historians defending historiography's will to tell the truth, on the other. Paul Ricoeur entered the discussion with his work Time and Narrative where he offered an inventive response.
According to him, both narration and scientific explication are essential to historical discourse. To support his statement, he introduces terms such as 'a third time,' 'a quasi-narration' or 'a historical consciousness.' Thus, he shifts attention from narration to time.
These terms can prove their usefulness when interpreting historical works. In the rest of the article, we aim to carry out such an interpretation on the example of Landscape and Memory by Simon Schama.
In a Ricœurian perspective, Schama's book reveals its deep time significance.