Abstract
Discussion around the concept of post-democracy in political science partially overlaps with a long-term narrative about the crisis of democracy. While there seems to be a general consensus on the concept of post-democracy, this notion is rather controversial.
The current paper analyzes the treatment of the concept of post-democracy in the works of Jacques Rancičre, Jürgen Habermas, Colin Crouch and others. The paper seeks to problematize temporal and spatial reductionism present in some conceptualisations of post-democracy, pointing to the contingency, temporality and contextuality of the forms of representative democracy as a possible way out of the melancholy nostalgia for a "golden age" of democracy and a way to seek a modus vivendi of democracy and representation in new conditions.