In my previous article (BA no. 7-8 / 2019), I stated that the reason for the unwillingness of the Supreme Court to compensate for common problems associated with bodily harm in other non-material harm is, inter alia, the fear that this type of harm "cannot be adjusted methodically." I am convinced that this concern is incorrect, which I illustrate by suggesting a compensation framework for the other non-material harm presented in this article, which can be put into practice immediately.