Abstract
scientific hypothesis of Global Warming (GW) and its recent variant Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) is not just a question of science anymore as it has becomde a part of politics. Therefore, we can see the consequences of it in our wallets (directly or indirectly).
Our paper analyses the development of the GW and/or AGW hypothesis from the point of view of the data. However it also examines what methods the mainstream uses to promote the AGW hypothesis (e.g. increasing of the "environmental" taxes).
The first chapter provides an overview of the GW (AGW) hypothesis development until the Kyoto Protocol. The weakest links of the AGW hypothesis and their alternative solutions are introduced in the second chapter.
It concludes that GW can be fully explained by natural processes, which are however not implemented in the climate models. The forms of enforcement of the resolutions adopted by the intergovernmental panel (IPCC) - starting with "environmental" taxes or "environmental" subsidies (for oil seed rape farming, scientific grants) and ending with the information warfare in the media - are covered in the third chapter.
The last chapter illustrates how the media war on climate scepticism ignores the standard of the scientific method.