In the 1870s, Carl Neumann proposed the so-called method of the arithmetic mean for solving the Dirichlet problem on convex domains. Neumann's approach was considered at the time to be a reliable existence proof, following Weierstrass's criticism of the Dirichlet principle.
However, in 1937 H. Lebesgue pointed out a serious gap in Neumann's proof.
Curiously, the erroneous argument once again involved confusion between the notions of infimum and minimum. The objective of this paper is to show that Lebesgue's sharp criticism of Neumann's proof was only partially justified.