The text aims to put the book under review, i.e. Stephen Snyder's book End of Art Philosophy in Hegel, Nietzsche and Danto into a larger context of contemporary debate and to evaluate its contribution to it.
In the first part, the review sums up individual chapters of the book, the second part interprets them critically and seek to answer the question of whether Snyder's book fulfils tasks defined in the introduction, i.e. explanation what the three accounts of the end of art have in common and to propose an alternative reading of the narrative of 20th-century art history in which art has not come to an end.