Neo-corporatism and policy process: In state-society interest groups corporate arrangement for third country nationals work promotion

Abstract

This article analysis the implication of the state and interest groups corporate intermediation of interest in the realm of Employment Act under neo-corporatism to understand young third country immigrants work promotion. Existing research pointed to the recent decades that have seen grown interest in advanced industrialized states public service reforms which promote the devolution of responsibility from the state to market with neo-corporatism institutionalized pattern of policy implementation emphasizes on large interest organization cooperate with each other and with public authorities in the intermediation of interest to reconcile competing groups interest with the public, but the governance pertains to question of inequality and entails risk because only to some extent can the state hold private agencies accountable to the public.

Analysing the state and interest groups corporate intermediation of interest under neo-corporatism to enable young third-country immigrants' work promotion are key to interpret the phenomenon in Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland. Based on a qualitative cross-country comparative research, official documents, published and unpublished scholastic texts are collected and analysed by means of a document and content analysis technique.

The findings show that macro-level corporation, meso-level corporation, and compliance monitoring are a major perceived influence in state-society corporatism intermediation of interest governance with lack of public value accountability and political disintegration that may jeopardize state-community antagonistic groups' organizational form when looking at issues such as young third country nationals and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups in corporatism intermediation of interest governance for work promotion setting. The study demonstrates a certain territorial pack decentralised multilevel governance in a mixed network economy of generalised exchange into public policy arena similarities.

However, the comparative entities are dissimilar in their institutionalized setting. The outcome points to deliberate democracy in neoliberal democratic setting with government regulatory governance to defuse social unrest in political crisis-management and navigates young vulnerable people into employment systems.

This is relevant to bureaucratic accountability and compliance monitoring, but the risks to democratic deficit, competitiveness, political inequality, and inefficiency in complex policy implementation process may impair ethnic minority people's belongings, jeopardize public value accountability, and hampered state-community trust with open democratic values.