Publication at Faculty of Arts |
2020
Abstract
This text offers a critical reply to the article "Must We Cross the Rubicon? Philosophy and Theology-New Boundaries" by Emmanuel Falque. I develop and defend a different answer to the question "What happens when we cross the boundary?" We neither synthesize the two disciplines nor do we subsume the one under the other, but, rather, we change perspectives.
In order to articulate this view, I make use of some suggestions made by Paul Ricœur. What we have here are not two riverbanks to be joined, but two perspectives that can be adopted in turn.