Neo-corporatism and unemployed: in government and interest groups intermediation of interest for work promotion
Abstrakt
This article analysis Governments and interest group's intermediation of employment interest under neo-corporatism to understand young third-country immigrants' transition to work in Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland. Existing research pointed to neo-corporatism that emphasize large interest group organization cooperates with each other and with public authorities in interest intermediation to reconcile competing group's interest with the public, but the governance leads to inequality.
Although neo-corporatism involves regulatory weakness, there is still little research in Central Eastern European (CEE) countries explaining Government and interests' group intermediation of employment interest under neocorporatism to understand young third-country immigrants' transition to work. Based on a qualitative cross-national case-oriented research approach with fewer-country comparison, documents, published and unpublished scholastic texts are collected and analysed by a document and content analysis technique to fill in this gap.
The findings show that exchange interaction, industrial restructuring, and compliance monitoring instruments are a major perceived influence in neo-corporatism governance with a lack of public value accountability that may impair the reconciliation of social dispute when looking at issues such as young third-country immigrants and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups in interest intermediation setting. The study demonstrates certain decentralised multilevel corporatist governance similarities but dissimilarities from the country's institutional context.
The outcome points to regulatory administrative devices to manage interest group's crisis and young vulnerable people's employment opportunities. This is relevant to bureaucratic accountability and deliberate democracy, but the risks to democratic deficit, competitiveness, political inequality, and inefficiency in the complex policy implementation process may impair ethnic minority people's belongings, jeopardize public the trust, and hampered open democratic values.