Identical claims as a (apparent) benefit for the efficiency of court proceedings

Abstract

If the parties make a fact uncontested, it usually relieves the judge. The benefits of the participants' identical statements regarding the decisive facts are obvious - the work will be to some extent "facilitated" by the court, as the scope of the identical statements eliminates the need to prove the facts in question.

Keywords

• Identical claims
• apparent
• benefit
• efficiency
• court proceedings