In Slavic languages, diminutivization is a highly productive morphological process. A diminutive marker can be attached to nouns, adjectives, verbs and adverbs.
Secondary or even multiple diminutives are also possible. Considering the combinability of diminutive suffi xes in nouns, Manova and Winternitz (2011) claim that only productive DIM1 suffi xes function as DIM2 suffi xes.
The aim of this paper is to verify this idea on the basis of the analysis of data from Czech and Slovak. The DIM2 for the analysis were excerpted from the corpora.
Neither Czech nor Slovak current sources apprehend diminutive markers as combinations of primary and secondary diminutive suffi xes. The complex character of secondary diminutivizers is understood as a diachronic issue.
Therefore, a historical analysis of all secondary diminutives was necessary. The research proved the assumption about the combinability of diminutive markers.
The analysis also revealed that unproductive DIM2 suffi xes are attached by substitution in both languages.