Charles Explorer logo
🇬🇧

Pedagogization in Identity Formation and Professionalization: the Role of Science, Knowledge Transfer, Education and Youth Social Care

Publication

Abstract

The conference poses questions about actors, prominent figures, institutions and processes:

- How have the institutions of science, education, education of the public and social pedagogical care co-determined the processes not just of self-identification, but also the formation of collective and professional identities and the processes of social and cultural integration/disintegration?

- What means or methods were used by individual pedagogical actors (individuals or associations, educational/scientific or public education institutions, etc.) to support/prevent the formation of the modern, postmodern and global personal as well as collective (professional pedagogical) identities?

- What about professional pedagogical identity and the formation of personal identity in the pedagogical and socialization processes during the second half of the 20th century under the conditions of totalitarian unfree society?

- What about professional pedagogical identity and the formation of personal identity in the pedagogical and socialization processes at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries: digital media, interaction and the digital environment as new spaces and means for the formation of personal and professional identities?

- Which prominent figures from the educational sciences and from educational and public educational life, co-determined or "disrupted"/rejected (whether consciously or unconsciously, intentionally or unintentionally) the pillars of personal and pedagogically professional human identities during the age of modernism, postmodernism and globalization (and digitalization), and how?

- Which pedagogical figures (often the largely forgotten "outsiders") are an example of the disintegration of the modern/postmodern/global human identity or "the crisis of expert and professional identity"; how did they try to respond to this "crisis"; how were they perceived (accepted/rejected) by the professional community and the wider society?