This paper focuses on the evaluation of variation of relative response factors (RRFs) obtained by two internal standard (IS) methods that are used to control the quality of alcoholic products. A standard IS method using 1-pentanol was compared with an "Ethanol as IS" method.
The variation of RRF values for both methods was determined using standard solutions based on 20, 40 and 96% ethanol-water matrices. For this purpose, solutions of the ten most abundant volatile compounds were analysed at four different concentrations (250, 500, 1000 and 5000 mg L(-1) absolute alcohol, AA) within these matrices.
Each solution was measured four times by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in single ion monitoring (SIM) mode under repeatability conditions. Our results showed that for the 40% and 96% matrices, the ethanol and standard IS methods showed similar relative standard deviations (RSDs) variation of no more than 2% within the 250-1000 mg L(-1) AA volatile compounds concentration range.
For the 20% matrix as well as for the 250-5000 mg L(-1) AA concentration range the resulting variation in calibration factors reaches 10% for both methods. As for the whole range of 20-96% alcohol by volume (ABV) and 250-5000 mg L(-1) AA volatile concentration range, the resultant RRFs for the standard IS method (8% RSD) were more stable than those for the ethanol IS method (almost 40% RSD).
Nonlinearity of the signal-to-amount dependence was also assessed with respect to the injection and detection processes.