Abstract
The relevant decision of the Constitutional Court is often interpreted in the sense of the inappropriateness of above-standard health care, but such an interpretation is incorrect. The reason for the cancellation was purely formal due to the definition of above-standard care in a decree rather than in statute.
With an appropriate, detailed, and directly applicable modification of the above-standard care in the law, the decision could rather confirm the constitutionality of such a system. So how can the above-standard care be approached in practice and what opportunities does it bring to insurance companies?