Perceived Legitimacy of Anti-Pandemic Measures: Findings from West and East Germany, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia at the Peak of the COVID-19 Crisis
Abstract
This interdisciplinary study examines the cross-cultural differences between the perceived legitimacy of anti-pandemic measures during the peak of the COVID-19 crisis in three Central European countries and four independent samples (West Germany, East Germany, the Czech Republic, Slovakia). A total of 2,752 participants completed a newly developed 7-item scale which inquired whether governmental regulations were perceived as fair, justified, and based on science and whether the government considered citizens' needs and the interests of their country, etc.
Analysis was done within the structural equation modeling framework. Scalar measurement invariance was successfully established between the studied countries, and a subsequent latent means comparison supported the hypothesis that German respondents would report higher legitimacy of the governmental anti-pandemic regulations than respondents from the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Additionally, as expected, the participants from the new German Länder (former East Germany) also manifested a consistent tendency to view governmental regulations as less legitimate than their Western fellow citizens. The results are discussed in terms of normative factors (i.e., the qualities of the authority which adopted the anti-pandemic measures, the qualities of the procedure through which these measures were adopted, and the qualities of the measures themselves) and psycho-socio-cultural factors (e.g., post-communist syndrome) and the influence of demographic variables.