Abstract
Background. We investigated the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 apps for estimating jump height, and the mean values of force, velocity, and power produced during countermovement (CMJ) and squat jumps (SJ).Methods.
Physically active university aged men (n = 10, 20 +/- 3 years, 176 +/- 6 cm, 68 +/- 9 kg) jumped on a force plate (i.e., criterion) while being recorded by a smartphone slow-motion camera. The videos were analyzed using Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 using a Samsung Galaxy S7 powered by the Android system.
Validity and reliability were determined by regression analysis, typical error of estimates and measurements, and intraclass correlation coefficients.Results. Both apps provided a reliable estimate of jump height and the mean values of force, velocity, and power.
Furthermore, estimates of jump height for CMJ and SJ and the mean force of the CMJ were valid. However, the apps presented impractical or poor validity correlations for velocity and power.
Compared with criterion, the apps underestimated the velocity of the CMJ.Conclusions. Therefore, Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 both provide a valid measure of jump height, but the remaining variables provided by these apps must be viewed with caution since the validity of force depends on jump type, while velocity (and as consequence power) could not be well estimated from the apps.