Charles Explorer logo
🇬🇧

Comparison between the Range of Movement Canine Real Cervical Spine and Numerical Simulation - Computer Model Validation

Publication at Central Library of Charles University |
2017

Abstract

In developing new or modifying the existing surgical treatment methods of spine conditions an integral part of ex vivo experiments is the assessment of mechanical, kinematic and dynamic properties of created constructions. The aim of the study is to create an appropriately validated numerical model of canine cervical spine in order to obtain a tool for basic research to be applied in cervical spine surgeries.

For this purpose, canine is a suitable model due to the occurrence of similar cervical spine conditions in some breeds of dogs and in humans. The obtained model can also be used in research and in clinical veterinary practice.

In order to create a 3D spine model, the LightSpeed 16 (GE, Milwaukee, USA) multidetector computed tomography was used to scan the cervical spine of Doberman Pinscher. The data were transmitted to Mimics 12 software (Materialise HQ, Belgium), in which the individual vertebrae were segmented on CT scans by thresholding.

The vertebral geometry was exported to Rhinoceros software (McNeel North America, USA) for modelling, and subsequently the specialised software Abaqus was used to analyse the response of the physiological spine model to external load by the finite element method (FEM). The comparisons between the mobility of cervical spine in ventroflexion/dorsiflexion on radiographs of the real models and the simulated numerical model by finite element method showed a high degree of results conformity with a minimal difference.

Therefore, for future experiments the validated numerical model can be used as a tool of basic research on condition that the results of analyses carried out by finite element method will be affected only by an insignificant error. The computer model, on the other hand, is merely a simplified system and in comparison with the real situation cannot fully evaluate the dynamics of the action of forces in time, their variability, and also the individual effects of supportive skeletal tissues.