Abstract
Orographic gravity waves (OGWs) are an important mechanism for coupling of the free atmosphere with the surface, mediating the momentum and energy transport and influencing the dynamics and circulation especially in the middle-atmosphere. Current global climate models are not able to resolve a large part of the OGW spectrum and hence, OGW effects have to be parameterized in the models.
Typically, the only parameterized effect is the OGW induced drag. Despite producing the same quantity as an output and relying on similar assumptions (e.g. instantaneous vertical propagation), the individual OGW parameterization schemes differ in many aspects such as handling of the orography, the inclusion of non-linear effects near the surface and the tuning of the emergent free parameters.
In this study, we have reviewed 7 different parameterizations, which are used in 9 different CMIP6 models. We report pronounced differences in the vertical distribution and magnitude of the parameterized OGW drag between the models and study to what extent the inter-model differences can be traced back to the difference in the type and tuning of the schemes.
Finally, we demonstrate how the OGW drag differences project to the intermodel differences in the stratospheric dynamics. The study can pave the way for a more systematic research of the OGW parameterizations in the future, with an ultimate goal of lowering the amount of uncertainty of the future climate projections connected with the parameterized effects of unresolved orography.