- Environmental Assets in System of National Accounts and SEEA 2000.Publication without faculty affiliation
- Legal nature of the National accounting board Interpretations2020 | Faculty of Law
- Revisions to Czech National Accounts: Properties and Predictability2013 | Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Faculty of Social Sciences
- Environmental accounting at macro level: classification, evaluation and depletion of environmental assets in the systems of national accounts.2001 | Publication without faculty affiliation
- Estimation of value of cannabis drugs and pervitin market2011 | First Faculty of Medicine
- Illicit drug market and its economic impact2013 | First Faculty of Medicine
- Material Flow Analysis at macroeconomic level: accounts, balance and indicators of material flows in the Czech Republic 1990-1999.Publication without faculty affiliation
- Indicators of economic performance: standard versus alternative (?).2004 | Publication without faculty affiliation
- Application of environmental accounting on subsoil asset. The Case study for the Czech RepublicPublication without faculty affiliation
- Environmental accounting on natural resources: accounting method and valuation of subsoil assets in the Czech Republic +12004 | Publication without faculty affiliation
- Assesment of Economic Productivity, Sustainability and Welfare2001 | Publication without faculty affiliation
- Accounting for environmental assets, with focus on subsoil assets in the Czech RepublicPublication without faculty affiliation
- Environmental accounting in the Czech Republic: an overview of the main projects completed and ongoing in the period of 1996-20042004 | Publication without faculty affiliation
- Environmental accounting in the Czech Republic: an overview of the main projects completed and ongoing in the period of 1996-2004.2004 | Publication without faculty affiliation
- The impact of a fat tax: Progressive in health, but regressive in income?2016 | Faculty of Social Sciences
- Czech economic thought 1945-1952 : a wasted chance in comparison with today's controversy2008 | Faculty of Social Sciences